제목 | How To Outsmart Your Boss On Mind Axes |
---|---|
작성자 | Clarice Hux |
claricehux@arcor.de | |
등록일 | 22-11-29 18:43 |
조회수 | 41 |
관련링크본문Understanding the Four Mind Axes
The four mind axes are related to the way we process information. These are Associativity, Directivity Convergence, Lexicality, and Associativity. Each of these categories is essential to the mind and understanding how they work is crucial for understanding human cognition. But, the mind's is not the same for every person. Associativity Associativity of the mind is a measure of how people think. People with high Associativity tend to be able to concentrate on one topic or idea for long periods of times instead, they tend to think in multiple streams of consciousness. They also move around topics frequently, which often leads to numerous connections. Contrary to other typesof people, however, associativity doesn't always mean disorganization or unfocusedness. One of the most important characteristics of Associativity is its capacity to think in many different ways. People who have high Associativity are more likely to be able to think on their feet as it is natural to them. The method is based on compass, but also is focused on internal cognitions of both axes. It is designed to inform people about cognition and the role it plays in the creation of communication patterns. It is similar in concept to Trixie's Neurotypology but it focuses more on internal processes rather than the external aspects. Directivity Mind axes can be used to evaluate various aspects of the human mind. It is possible to measure divergence as well as directivity in various aspects of our thinking. Divergent thinking is the capacity to generate multiple ideas from a single input and then form free associations. It is the opposite of Directivity and Convergence, in which we aim to create the most optimal solution from a cloud of data. Convergence Convergence between mind axes is a reference to a process of thinking in which we utilize our primary axes of thinking. This axis is strongly connected to the Analytical Axis and is wired to support Global Thinking. It is also connected to System 2, which is the process for analyzing and evaluating information in structured ways. Lexicality A system that focuses on cognition is essential because it incorporates the concept of Lexicality. Mind Axes systems distinguish types according to cognitive content. They don't rely on static characteristics or typologies. They're more like a compass , which describes how people perceive the world and the things that surround them. To test lexicality contrast, we tested two types of words. One was a high-frequency word, while the other was low-frequency words. The high-frequency words were contrasted against the words with low frequency and the two types were compared using lexicality contrast. The relationship between word frequency contrast and lexicality contrast was then evaluated. We also compared lexicality contrast against an a fixedation baseline. The results showed that imageability is influenced by the lexicality. High-frequency words are activated more than low-frequency words, and they are more active than words that are not. This is in line with previous research. The lexicality effect can also be observed in the left inferior frontal gyrus, right cerebellar region and the left fusiform area. Lexicality affects word-specific representations that include orthography, mind axes semantics, and phonology. These effects are also important for processes that don't rely on preexisting Lexical representations. Impressionism Impressionism was a late 19th century art movement that attempted to capture the fleeting qualities of light and color, and to investigate new psychological ideas about consciousness. The movement is most often associated with the works of Monet, Manet, Renoir, and Cezanne. It offers a visual representation of the Modernist break from Locke's empirical theory of knowledge. Seurat's works are among the most famous works in this style. However, Neo-Impressionism moved beyond this and evolved into pointillism. Paul Signac, Henri Edmond Cross, and others are notable examples from this period. Both of these artists were educated at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, where George Seuret studied. Laterality Laterality of mind refers to the ability to discern the indirect implications and consequences of events. It is an essential component of motor dexterity as well as movement. But how does a person think laterally There are several factors which contribute to this capability. One factor that contributes to this ability is the thumb's complicated. Laterality of mind refers specifically to individual differences in how the brain's hemispheres process information. These differences are more apparent in left-handed persons than right-handed people. For instance, people who are left-handed are more likely to use their right hemisphere to process language, while those who are right-handed are more likely use their right hemisphere for visual and spatial processing. However, lateralisation can also be influenced by more general and universal rules which govern behavior. When the laterality of mind axis is determined, cortical activity in the left and right hemispheres are predominantly engaged. This lateralization effect was observed even when auditory and visual cues were substituted for one other. It was evident regardless of nature of the stimulus. |
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.